Murphy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Murphy v. State

1925 OK CR 70, 232 P. 1118, 29 Okla. Crim. 159, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 63

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 12, 1925

DocketNo. A-4804.

StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK CR 70 (Murphy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murphy v. State, 1925 OK CR 70, 232 P. 1118, 29 Okla. Crim. 159, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 63 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, H. J. Murphy, was convicted upon a charge that he did unlawfully have possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 90 days and pay a fine of $250. To reverse the judgment an appeal was perfected, by filing in this court on August 11, 1923, a petition in error with case-made. When the case was called for final submission, January 21, .1925, his death was suggested. It is therefore adjudged and ordered that the proceedings in this cause do abate, and the same is remanded, with direction to the trial court to enter its appropriate order to that effect.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, H. J. Murphy, was convicted upon a charge that he did unlawfully have possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 90 days and pay a fine of $250. To reverse the judgment an appeal was perfected, by filing in this court on August 11, 1923, a petition in error with case-made. When the case was called for final submission, January 21, .1925, his death was suggested. It is therefore adjudged and ordered that the proceedings in this cause do abate, and the same is remanded, with direction to the trial court to enter its appropriate order to that effect.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1925 OK CR 70, 232 P. 1118, 29 Okla. Crim. 159, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-state-oklacrimapp-1925.