Murphy v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Murphy v. State

796 S.W.2d 894, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1038, 1990 WL 94138

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 10, 1990

DocketNo. 56894

StatusPublished

This text of 796 S.W.2d 894 (Murphy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murphy v. State, 796 S.W.2d 894, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1038, 1990 WL 94138 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

796 S.W.2d 894, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1038, 1990 WL 94138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-state-moctapp-1990.