Murphy v. State

161 S.E. 270, 44 Ga. App. 292, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 680
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 11, 1931
Docket21743
StatusPublished

This text of 161 S.E. 270 (Murphy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy v. State, 161 S.E. 270, 44 Ga. App. 292, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 680 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The evidence was sufficient to authorize the jury to convict.', and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur. Darsey Darsey, for plaintiff in error. W. H. Connor, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 S.E. 270, 44 Ga. App. 292, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-state-gactapp-1931.