Murphy v. State

383 S.E.2d 112, 259 Ga. 388
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 6, 1989
DocketS89A0011
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 383 S.E.2d 112 (Murphy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy v. State, 383 S.E.2d 112, 259 Ga. 388 (Ga. 1989).

Opinion

Bell, Justice.

The appellant, James Lloyd Murphy, appeals from his convictions of malice murder and of the possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. The trial court sentenced Murphy to life imprisonment for murder and to a consecutive five years in prison for the firearm count.1 We affirm.

On October 7, 1988, Murphy and the victim, Eugene Hall, were drinking at a bar with friends. Hall became belligerent toward everyone at the table, particularly Murphy. Murphy then left the bar and went outside to the parking lot, where he stopped to talk with a friend. Hall came outside, approached Murphy, and punched Murphy in the mouth, knocking him unconscious. When Murphy awoke, he and a friend, Ricky Holt, left in Murphy’s car, with Holt driving. After they had driven around a few minutes, Murphy had Holt stop the car. Murphy then took the keys, opened his trunk, took a shotgun out, and loaded it. Murphy told Holt he wanted to find out why Hall had “sucker punched” him. They then rode back to the bar, but Hall was not there. Murphy and Holt then drove to a different bar, where they saw Hall in the parking lot. Murphy asked Hall to come over to the car, and Hall complied. When Hall reached the car, Murphy shot him with the shotgun.

According to Murphy’s and Holt’s testimony, Hall had cursed as he walked over to the car, and had reached around to his back pocket as he got to the car. Murphy testified that he thought Hall was reaching for a gun, and that he shot Hall in self-defense. However, although evidence was introduced at trial that Hall had a reputation for carrying a gun in his back pocket, no weapon was found on or around Hall at the scene. Moreover, in a statement made to the police later that night, Murphy admitted calling the victim over to the car and shooting him, but he failed to say that Hall was reaching for his back pocket or that he shot Hall in self-defense.

The trial court charged the jury, among other things, on malice murder, voluntary manslaughter, and self-defense. As noted previously, the jury found Murphy guilty of malice murder.

In his sole enumeration of error, Murphy contends that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction of malice murder. However, reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prose[389]*389cution, we conclude that the evidence is sufficient to support Murphy’s conviction, in that a rational trier of fact could have found Murphy guilty of murder beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

Decided September 6, 1989. Short & Fowler, Larkin M. Fowler, Jr., for appellant. H. Lamar Cole, District Attorney, Charles M. Stines, Assistant District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Andrew S. Ree, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Traylor v. State
627 S.E.2d 594 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
383 S.E.2d 112, 259 Ga. 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-state-ga-1989.