Murphy v. State

164 So. 3d 49, 2015 WL 1930093

Opinion

CASANUEVA, Judge.

Based upon our independent review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we affirm Diane Gail Murphy’s judgment and sentence without further comment. However, we remand with directions to correct a scrivener’s error which appears in both the judgment and the order of probation. Ms. Murphy was charged with, entered a plea to, and was sentenced for felony petit theft (two or more prior convictions for theft). See § 812.014(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013). The judgment and order of probation, however, reflect that Ms. Murphy entered a plea to grand theft of property over $300, but less than $20,000. See § 812.014(2)(c). Accordingly, we remand for correction of these’ errors.

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

KHOUZAM and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.