Murphy v. State

801 So. 2d 1010, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17879, 2001 WL 1614140
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 19, 2001·No. No. 4D01-2971·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We accept the State’s concession that the case should be remanded to the trial court with directions to grant appellant’s two motions for voluntary dismissal without prejudice, which were filed approximately one and two months, respectively, before the trial court denied appellant’s motion for postconviction relief filed on April 25, 2001, and reverse the trial court’s order summarily denying the motion for postconviction relief. See Dunn v. State, 762 So.2d 593 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Howard v. State, 743 So.2d 608 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Carvalleria v. State, 675 So.2d 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). On remand, the court should consider the amended motion which appellant has already filed.

POLEN, C.J., KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. State, 801 So. 2d 1010, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17879, 2001 WL 1614140 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

801 So. 2d 1010 (Murphy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Small v. State
875 So. 2d 1276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)