Murphy v. State
This text of 694 So. 2d 835 (Murphy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michael R. MURPHY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
James P. Harris, Jr., of Law Office of Steve Pincket, Lakeland, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Angela D. McCravy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Michael R. Murphy appeals his convictions and sentences for murder and grand theft. We affirm the convictions without discussion, but reverse and remand for resentencing.
Although the trial court orally stated its reason for exceeding the guidelines on the grand theft count, that reason was never reduced to writing and signed by the judge as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.702(d)(18). See Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990); Wilcox v. State, 664 So.2d 55 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Therefore, we reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing within the guidelines.
We also strike the $300 attorney's fee without prejudice to the fees being assessed upon resentencing after the defendant is informed of his right to contest the amount. See Cherubin v. State, 682 So.2d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Drinnon v. State, 598 So.2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FULMER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
694 So. 2d 835, 1997 WL 271315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.