Murphy v. State

519 So. 2d 1108, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 395, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 538, 1988 WL 8086
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 10, 1988·No. No. 87-2057·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief because the record reflects that a prior motion alleging the same grounds and prayer for relief had been filed and denied. See Stewart v. State, 495 So.2d 164 (Fla.1986).

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. State, 519 So. 2d 1108, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 395, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 538, 1988 WL 8086 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

519 So. 2d 1108 (Murphy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roosa v. Roosa
519 So. 2d 1108 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)