Murphy v. St. Paul City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Murphy v. St. Paul City Railway Co.

65 N.W. 356, 63 Minn. 301, 1895 Minn. LEXIS 492

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedDecember 23, 1895

DocketNos. 9748-(223)

StatusPublished

This text of 65 N.W. 356 (Murphy v. St. Paul City Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murphy v. St. Paul City Railway Co., 65 N.W. 356, 63 Minn. 301, 1895 Minn. LEXIS 492 (Mich. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

BUCK, J.

This case comes within the rule laid down in Hicks v. Stone, 13 Minn. 398 (434), and repeatedly followed by this court; and the evidence is so far from being manifestly and palpably in favor of the verdict that the preponderance thereof is against it. As great weight is given by this court to the opinion of the trial judge, and there appears no abuse of his discretion, the order granting a new trial is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUCK, J.

This case comes within the rule laid down in Hicks v. Stone, 13 Minn. 398 (434), and repeatedly followed by this court; and the evidence is so far from being manifestly and palpably in favor of the verdict that the preponderance thereof is against it. As great weight is given by this court to the opinion of the trial judge, and there appears no abuse of his discretion, the order granting a new trial is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 N.W. 356, 63 Minn. 301, 1895 Minn. LEXIS 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-st-paul-city-railway-co-minn-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack