Murphy v. Shea

Eighth Circuit

Murphy v. Shea

176 F. 544, 100 C.C.A. 132, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4277

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 14, 1910·No. No. 2,987·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

CARLAND, District Judge.

This is an action of ejectment commenced m the United States Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota, to recover the possession of a parcel of land claimed to be a part of lot 2, section 3, and lots 1 and 8 of section 4, township 57 north, range 17 west, St. Louis county, Minn. The case is ruled by the ease of the same plaintiffs in error v. Tanner and Cronin, defendants in error (No. 2,986, just decided) 176 Fed. 537.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed, with directions to enter judgment, upon the facts found, in favor of plaintiffs in error for the possession of so much of the land demanded in the complaint as lies north of the Faison meander boundary line. >

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CARLAND, District Judge.

This is an action of ejectment commenced m the United States Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota, to recover the possession of a parcel of land claimed to be a part of lot 2, section 3, and lots 1 and 8 of section 4, township 57 north, range 17 west, St. Louis county, Minn. The case is ruled by the ease of the same plaintiffs in error v. Tanner and Cronin, defendants in error (No. 2,986, just decided) 176 Fed. 537.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed, with directions to enter judgment, upon the facts found, in favor of plaintiffs in error for the possession of so much of the land demanded in the complaint as lies north of the Faison meander boundary line. >

Murphy v. Shea, 176 F. 544, 100 C.C.A. 132, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4277 (8th Cir. 1910).

Pincite

176 F. 544 (Murphy v. Shea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related