Murphy v. Shea

176 F. 544, 100 C.C.A. 132, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4277
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 14, 1910
DocketNo. 2,987
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 176 F. 544 (Murphy v. Shea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy v. Shea, 176 F. 544, 100 C.C.A. 132, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4277 (8th Cir. 1910).

Opinion

CARLAND, District Judge.

This is an action of ejectment commenced m the United States Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota, to recover the possession of a parcel of land claimed to be a part of lot 2, section 3, and lots 1 and 8 of section 4, township 57 north, range 17 west, St. Louis county, Minn. The case is ruled by the ease of the same plaintiffs in error v. Tanner and Cronin, defendants in error (No. 2,986, just decided) 176 Fed. 537.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed, with directions to enter judgment, upon the facts found, in favor of plaintiffs in error for the possession of so much of the land demanded in the complaint as lies north of the Faison meander boundary line. >

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lamb v. United States
526 F. Supp. 1117 (M.D. Georgia, 1981)
Midland Oil Co. v. Moore
2 F.2d 34 (Eighth Circuit, 1924)
Waters v. Guile
234 F. 532 (Sixth Circuit, 1916)
Fordham v. Hicks
224 F. 810 (S.D. Georgia, 1915)
Nichols v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.
195 F. 913 (Sixth Circuit, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 F. 544, 100 C.C.A. 132, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-shea-ca8-1910.