Murphy v. Sardell
269 U.S. 530, 46 S. Ct. 22
Opinion
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed upon the. authority of Adkins v. Children’s Hospital, 261 U. S. 525. Mr. Justice Holmes requests that it be stated that his concurrence is solely upon the ground that he regards himself bound by the decision in Adkins v. Children’s Hospital.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Murphy v. Sardell, 269 U.S. 530, 46 S. Ct. 22 (1925).
269 U.S. 530 (Murphy v. Sardell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish
300 U.S. 379 (Supreme Court, 1937)
State ex rel. Attorney General v. Fasekas
269 N.W. 700 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1937)
Morehead v. New York Ex Rel. Tipaldo
298 U.S. 587 (Supreme Court, 1936)
Kent Stores of New Jersey v. Wilentz
14 F. Supp. 1 (D. New Jersey, 1936)
People Ex Rel. Tipaldo v. Morehead
200 N.E. 799 (New York Court of Appeals, 1936)
Donham v. West-Nelson Manufacturing Co.
273 U.S. 657 (Supreme Court, 1927)