Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Murphy v. Rimel

Murphy v. Rimel

703 So. 2d 518, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14357, 1998 WL 25599
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 24, 1997
DocketNo. 97-0097
StatusPublished

This text of 703 So. 2d 518 (Murphy v. Rimel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy v. Rimel, 703 So. 2d 518, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14357, 1998 WL 25599 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Erp v. Carroll, 438 So.2d 31 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). As to appellee Rimel, see also section 768.28(9)(a), Florida Statutes (1995); Price v. Morgan, 436 So.2d 1116, 1121 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

DELL and WARNER, JJ., and PARIENTE, BARBARA J., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Price v. Morgan
436 So. 2d 1116 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Erp v. Carroll
438 So. 2d 31 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
703 So. 2d 518, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14357, 1998 WL 25599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-rimel-fladistctapp-1997.