Murphy v. Reardon

261 A.D.2d 517, 690 N.Y.S.2d 651, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5390

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Franco, J.), entered January 27, 1998, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $193,108.36.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the plaintiff’s prior [518] action to recover money owed by the defendant pursuant to a promissory note (see, Murphy v Reardon, 211 AD2d 704) does not warrant dismissal of this action by the plaintiff to recover money owed by the defendant pursuant to a separate agreement between the parties (see, Murray, Hollander, Sullivan & Bass v Hem Research, 111 AD2d 63; Milnes Co. v Staten Is. Bd. of Jewish Educ., 26 AD2d 831).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Santucci, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. Reardon, 261 A.D.2d 517, 690 N.Y.S.2d 651, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5390 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

261 A.D.2d 517 (Murphy v. Reardon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

John Milnes Co. v. Staten Island Board on Jewish Education, Inc.
26 A.D.2d 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Murray, Hollander, Sullivan & Bass v. HEM Research, Inc.
111 A.D.2d 63 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Murphy v. Reardon
211 A.D.2d 704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)