Murphy v. Quinter

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Murphy v. Quinter

417 S.E.2d 223, 203 Ga. App. 271, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 497

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 9, 1992

DocketA92A0852

StatusPublished

This text of 417 S.E.2d 223 (Murphy v. Quinter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murphy v. Quinter, 417 S.E.2d 223, 203 Ga. App. 271, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 497 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Sognier, Chief Judge.

After Sharlene Quinter obtained a judgment against him in magistrate court, Brant Murphy appealed to the State Court of Cobb County. Judgment in favor of Quinter was entered in that court on November 8, 1991. The record does not reflect any timely filed motion for new trial. See OCGA § 5-5-40 (a). Murphy filed his notice of a direct appeal to this court on December 16, 1991.

Pretermitting the application of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11), the record establishes that Murphy’s notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after entry of the judgment from which he sought to appeal and that he made no application for an extension of time for filing the [272]*272notice. Therefore, Murphy has not followed the requirements set forth in OCGA § 5-6-38 (a) and because this court does not have jurisdiction over this appeal, see Bowen v. Clayton County Hosp. Auth., 160 Ga. App. 809, 810 (288 SE2d 232) (1982), Murphy’s appeal is dismissed.

Decided March 9, 1992. Brant Murphy, pro se. Stanley W. Levitt, for appellee.

Judgment dismissed.

McMurray, P. J., and Cooper, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sognier, Chief Judge.

After Sharlene Quinter obtained a judgment against him in magistrate court, Brant Murphy appealed to the State Court of Cobb County. Judgment in favor of Quinter was entered in that court on November 8, 1991. The record does not reflect any timely filed motion for new trial. See OCGA § 5-5-40 (a). Murphy filed his notice of a direct appeal to this court on December 16, 1991.

Pretermitting the application of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11), the record establishes that Murphy’s notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after entry of the judgment from which he sought to appeal and that he made no application for an extension of time for filing the [272]*272notice. Therefore, Murphy has not followed the requirements set forth in OCGA § 5-6-38 (a) and because this court does not have jurisdiction over this appeal, see Bowen v. Clayton County Hosp. Auth., 160 Ga. App. 809, 810 (288 SE2d 232) (1982), Murphy’s appeal is dismissed.

Decided March 9, 1992. Brant Murphy, pro se. Stanley W. Levitt, for appellee.

Judgment dismissed.

McMurray, P. J., and Cooper, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

417 S.E.2d 223, 203 Ga. App. 271, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-quinter-gactapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack