Murphy v. Pricewaterhouse

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

C. WESTBROOK MURPHY and HAROLD SCHULER,

Plaintiffs, Civil Case N0. 02-0982 (RJL) v. Civil Case N0. 05-1054 (RJL) PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP,

Defendant.

\ééSS€€éS€\/\d\_/

ORDER `D\`

For the reasons set forth above, it is this_z_ day of September, 2011 hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs’ request to amend their initial Complaint is DENIED, and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiff Schuler’s Motion for Partia1 Summary Judgment on Liability [Dkt. #235] is DENIED, and it is further

ORDERED that defendant PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP’s Motion for Summary

Judgrnent on All Remaining Claims [Dkt. #236] is GRANTED, and it is further

ORDERED that the above-captioned cases be dismissed with prejudice

SO ORDERED.

/

@.O<»i»~/

RICHARD JLJ,E<$N United States District Judge