Home/New York Court of Appeals/Murphy v. Peterson Cipher Code Corp.

Murphy v. Peterson Cipher Code Corp.

105 N.E.2d 497, 303 N.Y. 912, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 1368
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 14, 1952
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 105 N.E.2d 497 (Murphy v. Peterson Cipher Code Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy v. Peterson Cipher Code Corp., 105 N.E.2d 497, 303 N.Y. 912, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 1368 (N.Y. 1952).

Opinion

Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the jury was not clearly instructed that the written statement by the plaintiff’s witness Bowman could not serve as affirmative evidence of substantive facts stated therein but only, as a means of impeachment, to prove that he had made a prior statement inconsistent with his testimony upon the trial. (Matter of Roge v. Valentine, 280 N. Y. 268, 276-277; Civ. Prac. Act, § 343-a.) No opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Goodman
2 A.D.2d 558 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 N.E.2d 497, 303 N.Y. 912, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 1368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-peterson-cipher-code-corp-ny-1952.