Murphy v. Palm Mattress Co.

889 So. 2d 222, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 20161, 2004 WL 2964134
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 23, 2004
Docket1D04-4639
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 889 So. 2d 222 (Murphy v. Palm Mattress Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy v. Palm Mattress Co., 889 So. 2d 222, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 20161, 2004 WL 2964134 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

889 So.2d 222 (2004)

William M. MURPHY, Appellant,
v.
PALM MATTRESS COMPANY/RSKCO, Appellees.

No. 1D04-4639.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 23, 2004.

William M. Murphy, appellant, pro se.

No appearance for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We are constrained to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.180(b)(2) provides that our jurisdiction to review proceedings in workers' compensation cases must be invoked by filing a notice of appeal within 30 days of the date the order to be reviewed is mailed to the parties. Appellant failed to meet this jurisdictional deadline, and we are without authority to either extend the deadline or forgive appellant's late filing.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

BOOTH, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rance v. D.R. Horton, Inc.
953 So. 2d 622 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
889 So. 2d 222, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 20161, 2004 WL 2964134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-palm-mattress-co-fladistctapp-2004.