Murphy v. New York Central Railroad

240 A.D. 894

Opinion

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. We are of opinion that the case is indistinguishable in principle from Miller v. Central R. Co. of New Jersey (58 F. [2d] 635); Philadelphia, B. & W. R. Co. v. M’Connell (228 Fed. 263). (See, also, Pedersen v. Del., Lack. & West. R. R., 229 U. S. 146; Pallocco v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 236 N. Y. 110.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. New York Central Railroad, 240 A.D. 894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

240 A.D. 894 (Murphy v. New York Central Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
229 U.S. 146 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Pallocco v. . Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.
140 N.E. 212 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)
Philadelphia, B. & W. R. v. McConnell
228 F. 263 (Third Circuit, 1915)