Murphy v. Murphy, No. Cv 92-0448945s (Apr. 24, 1992)

1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 3874
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedApril 24, 1992
DocketNo. CV 92-0448945S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 3874 (Murphy v. Murphy, No. Cv 92-0448945s (Apr. 24, 1992)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy v. Murphy, No. Cv 92-0448945s (Apr. 24, 1992), 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 3874 (Colo. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANT ROSELLI'S MOTION TO DISMISS The motion to dismiss is granted for the reasons set forth in defendant's brief. See Conn. Gen. Stat. sec. 52-62(c), D'Occhio v. Conn. Real Estate Commission, 189 Conn. 1621, 171 (1983). Hartley v. Vitiello, 113 Conn. 74, 80 (1931), Grayson v. Wolfsey, Rosen, Kweskin and Kuriansky, 40 Conn. Sup. 1, 2 (1984) and Hyde v. Richardson, 145 Conn. 24, 25 (1958).

WILLIAM M. SHAUGHNESSY, JR. JUDGE, SUPERIOR COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hartley v. Vitiello
154 A. 255 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1931)
Grayson v. Wofsey, Rosen, Kweskin & Kuriansky
478 A.2d 629 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1984)
Hyde v. Richard
138 A.2d 527 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 3874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-murphy-no-cv-92-0448945s-apr-24-1992-connsuperct-1992.