Murphy v. Murphy, No. Cv 92-0448945s (Apr. 24, 1992)

1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 3874
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided April 24, 1992·No. No. CV 92-0448945S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANT ROSELLI'S MOTION TO DISMISS The motion to dismiss is granted for the reasons set forth in defendant's brief. See Conn. Gen. Stat. sec. 52-62(c), D'Occhio v. Conn. Real Estate Commission, 189 Conn. 1621, 171 (1983). Hartley v. Vitiello, 113 Conn. 74, 80 (1931), Grayson v. Wolfsey, Rosen, Kweskin and Kuriansky, 40 Conn. Sup. 1, 2 (1984) and Hyde v. Richardson, 145 Conn. 24, 25 (1958).

WILLIAM M. SHAUGHNESSY, JR. JUDGE, SUPERIOR COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. Murphy, No. Cv 92-0448945s (Apr. 24, 1992), 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 3874 (Colo. Ct. App. 1992).

1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 3874 (Murphy v. Murphy, No. Cv 92-0448945s (Apr. 24, 1992)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hartley v. Vitiello
154 A. 255 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1931)
Grayson v. Wofsey, Rosen, Kweskin & Kuriansky
478 A.2d 629 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1984)
Hyde v. Richard
138 A.2d 527 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1958)