Murphy v. Murphy

180 A. 829, 119 N.J. Eq. 83, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 594
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 9, 1935·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal is from a decree construing a provision of the will of John Henry Murphy, deceased, whereby his printing business, the trade good will and fixtures were devised to his son and two trusted employes, one of whom was his brother. The learned vice-chancellor found that the devisees taking the printing business were entitled to a bank account used therein, together with the accounts receivable less the accounts payable. The record before this court clearly established the intent that the business as a going concern, with the bank account and receivables, should pass.

The decree appealed from is affirmed.

*84 For affirmance —The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 15.

For reversal —None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. Murphy, 180 A. 829, 119 N.J. Eq. 83, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 594 (N.J. 1935).

180 A. 829 (Murphy v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Robert
178 A.2d 185 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1962)
Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Robert
171 A.2d 348 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Bank of New York v. Black
139 A.2d 393 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1958)
Federal Trust Co. v. Walsh
90 A.2d 119 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Polliak v. Smith
88 A.2d 351 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Van Buren v. Plainfield Trust Co.
22 A.2d 189 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1941)
Browning v. Browning
7 A.2d 816 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)
Hersh v. Rosensohn
3 A.2d 877 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)