Murphy v. Murphy

231 S.E.2d 743, 238 Ga. 130, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 922
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 4, 1977
Docket31478
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 231 S.E.2d 743 (Murphy v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy v. Murphy, 231 S.E.2d 743, 238 Ga. 130, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 922 (Ga. 1977).

Opinion

Hill, Justice.

This divorce case began in June 1972 when Michael Vincent Murphy, III, filed for divorce in Fulton Superior Court. For earlier proceedings, see Murphy v. Murphy, 232 Ga. 352 (206 SE2d 458) (1974), cert. den. 421 U. S. 929. On September 15,1972, the court awarded temporary custody of the parties’ only child to the father’s parents, with whom the father lived. Later, after granting the parties a divorce on the ground that the marriage was irretrievably broken, the court held a final hearing in 1976 on the child custody issue and awarded permanent custody to the father. The mother appeals.

The mother argues that the evidence at the hearing *131 required that custody be awarded to her. In all cases of divorce, the court in the exercise of a sound discretion may look into all the circumstances and, after hearing both parties, determine custody of the children. Code Ann. § 30-127. Where the trial judge exercises a sound legal discretion looking to the best interests of the child, this court will not interfere with his judgment unless it is shown that his discretion was abused. Lynn v. Lynn, 202 Ga. 776 (44 SE2d 769) (1947). Although the evidence would have supported an award to the mother, there is evidence to support the court’s judgment.

Argued September 21, 1976 — Decided January 4, 1977. Kilpatrick, Cody, Rogers, McClatchey & Regenstein, A. Stephens Clay, J. Rodgers Lunsford, III, for appellant. John C. Tyler, John L. Westmoreland, Jr., for appellee.

Looking to the final resolution of this dispute for the best interest of the child, we find no reversible error in the remaining enumerations.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re R. E. W.
267 Ga. 897 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
In Re REW
472 S.E.2d 295 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Gambrell v. Gambrell
259 S.E.2d 439 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)
Golz v. Golz
256 S.E.2d 382 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)
Sanders v. Sanders
250 S.E.2d 488 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1978)
Harris v. Harris
240 S.E.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 S.E.2d 743, 238 Ga. 130, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-murphy-ga-1977.