Murphy v. Murphy

107 S.E. 37, 151 Ga. 438, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 281
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 15, 1921·No. No. 2201·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. The persons who, under the deed in question, were to take remainder interests not being certain until the death of the life-tenant, the remainder interests were contingent, and could not become vested until the death of the life-tenant. Darnell v. Barton, 75 Ga. 377.

2. The words “representatives of such children, if any,” as used in the deed, mean children of deceased children of the life-tenant, and do not include the wife of a child who predeceased the life-tenqnt, leaving no children. See Cushman v. Coleman, 92 Ga. 772 (2), 774 (19 S. E. 46); Civil Code (1910), § 3660.

3. Applying the above rulings to the facts alleged in the petition, the court erred in overruling the demurrer.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. Claude Bond and C. M. McClure, for plaintiffs in error. Goode & Owen and James H. & Emmett Shelton, eontrá.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. Murphy, 107 S.E. 37, 151 Ga. 438, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 281 (Ga. 1921).

107 S.E. 37 (Murphy v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hack v. Woodward
284 S.E.2d 411 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1981)
Shedden v. Donaldson
60 S.E.2d 158 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Morris v. First National Bank of Atlanta
42 S.E.2d 215 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Stout v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
189 S.E. 248 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Ivey v. Davis
165 S.E. 605 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Lumpkin v. Patterson
152 S.E. 448 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Dismukes v. Bagley
141 S.E. 902 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)