Murphy v. Murphy

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Murphy v. Murphy

912 So. 2d 353, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15721, 2005 WL 2447877

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 5, 2005

DocketNo. 3D05-615

StatusPublished

This text of 912 So. 2d 353 (Murphy v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murphy v. Murphy, 912 So. 2d 353, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15721, 2005 WL 2447877 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Deirdre Murphy (“wife”), appeals the trial court’s adverse order granting William Murphy’s (“husband”), emergency motion for release of funds. Because the trial court entered its order without conducting a hearing on the husband’s exceptions, we reverse. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.490(h); Lehrman v. Vondra, 786 So.2d 673 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Scott v. Scott, 667 So.2d 975 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Berkheimer v. Berkheimer, 466 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); see also Bragassa v. Bragassa, 505 So.2d 556 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)(master’s findings cannot be overturned by the trial court unless the findings are clearly erroneous). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to conduct a full hearing on the husband’s exceptions.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Deirdre Murphy (“wife”), appeals the trial court’s adverse order granting William Murphy’s (“husband”), emergency motion for release of funds. Because the trial court entered its order without conducting a hearing on the husband’s exceptions, we reverse. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.490(h); Lehrman v. Vondra, 786 So.2d 673 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Scott v. Scott, 667 So.2d 975 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Berkheimer v. Berkheimer, 466 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); see also Bragassa v. Bragassa, 505 So.2d 556 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)(master’s findings cannot be overturned by the trial court unless the findings are clearly erroneous). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to conduct a full hearing on the husband’s exceptions.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

912 So. 2d 353, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15721, 2005 WL 2447877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-murphy-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack