Murphy v. Murphy

912 So. 2d 353, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15721, 2005 WL 2447877
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 5, 2005·No. No. 3D05-615·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Deirdre Murphy (“wife”), appeals the trial court’s adverse order granting William Murphy’s (“husband”), emergency motion for release of funds. Because the trial court entered its order without conducting a hearing on the husband’s exceptions, we reverse. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.490(h); Lehrman v. Vondra, 786 So.2d 673 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Scott v. Scott, 667 So.2d 975 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Berkheimer v. Berkheimer, 466 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); see also Bragassa v. Bragassa, 505 So.2d 556 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)(master’s findings cannot be overturned by the trial court unless the findings are clearly erroneous). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to conduct a full hearing on the husband’s exceptions.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. Murphy, 912 So. 2d 353, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15721, 2005 WL 2447877 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

912 So. 2d 353 (Murphy v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Berkheimer v. Berkheimer
466 So. 2d 1219 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Bragassa v. Bragassa
505 So. 2d 556 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Scott v. Scott
667 So. 2d 975 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Lehrman v. Guardianship of Vondra
786 So. 2d 673 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)