Murphy v. Murphy Benvenuto
This text of 886 So. 2d 88 (Murphy v. Murphy Benvenuto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.
See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(A), Ala. R.App. P.; Killen v. Akin, 519 So.2d 926 (Ala.1988); Landis v. Neal, 374 So.2d 275 (AIa.1979); Mullins v. Mullins, 770 So.2d 624 (Ala.Civ.App.2000); Tidwell v. Tidwell, 505 So.2d 1236 (Ala.Civ.App.1987); Oliver v. Oliver, 431 So.2d 1271 (Ala.Civ.App.1983); and East v. East, 395 So.2d 78 (Ala.Civ.App.1980).
The appellee’s request for an attorney fee is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
886 So. 2d 88, 2003 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 410, 2003 WL 21418303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-murphy-benvenuto-alacivapp-2003.