Murphy v. Mercer

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Murphy v. Mercer

194 S.E.2d 581, 127 Ga. App. 645, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 986

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 28, 1972·No. 47640·Published

Opinion

Quillian, Judge.

1. Upon motion for summary judgment it was shown: that the appellee purchased an automobile from the appellant with the agreement that said automobile was free and clear of all liens; that the appellant failed to deliver to the appellee a good and marketable title. Based upon the facts the trial court was correct in granting the appellee’s motion for summary judgment as to liability in this action.

2. The remaining enumeration of error is without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Hall, P. J., and Pannell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quillian, Judge.

1. Upon motion for summary judgment it was shown: that the appellee purchased an automobile from the appellant with the agreement that said automobile was free and clear of all liens; that the appellant failed to deliver to the appellee a good and marketable title. Based upon the facts the trial court was correct in granting the appellee’s motion for summary judgment as to liability in this action.

2. The remaining enumeration of error is without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Hall, P. J., and Pannell, J., concur.

Murphy v. Mercer, 194 S.E.2d 581, 127 Ga. App. 645, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 986 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

194 S.E.2d 581 (Murphy v. Mercer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.