Murphy v. McMullin

69 A. 70, 219 Pa. 506, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 611
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 6, 1908·No. Appeal, No. 127·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The memorandum offered as well as the books by which it was to be followed, was in defendant’s own interest. It was not part of the res gestae, for several reasons, the principal and conclusive one of which was that it was a secret act of the defendant of which the other party had no notice and therefore could not under any rule be supposed to acquiesce in by silence. The cases where such declarations or memoranda become evidence are where the claim is challenged as an afterthought and it becomes material to show that it was, as it purports to be, cotemporary with the transaction.

. The other matters in the case were questions of fact for the ¡Fry.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. McMullin, 69 A. 70, 219 Pa. 506, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 611 (Pa. 1908).

69 A. 70 (Murphy v. McMullin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marino v. Vecchio
83 Pa. Super. 377 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Sabo v. Stefan
2 Pa. D. & C. 61 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1922)
Osterling v. Allegheny Trust Co.
103 A. 528 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)
Markee v. Reyburn
101 A. 993 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Miles' Estate
66 Pa. Super. 115 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)