Murphy v. Mahoney
This text of 272 A.D.2d 989 (Murphy v. Mahoney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant has appealed from a judgment of the Broome Trial Term of Supreme Court [990]*990directing him to specifically perform an agreement to convey a restaurant business in the city of Binghamton to plaintiff. The evidence sustains the judgment. Judgment affirmed, with costs and disbursements to plaintiff-respondent. All concur. [See post, p. 1085,'J
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 A.D.2d 989, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-mahoney-nyappdiv-1947.