Murphy v. . Ludlum Steel Company
126 N.E. 915, 227 N.Y. 634, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 809
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chase, Hogan, Cardozo and Crane, JJ. Dissenting: Hiscock, Ch. J.. Collin and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Murphy v. . Ludlum Steel Company, 126 N.E. 915, 227 N.Y. 634, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 809 (N.Y. 1919).
126 N.E. 915 (Murphy v. . Ludlum Steel Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Thomas
127 So. 165 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1930)
Matter of Giliotti v. Hoffman Catering Co.
158 N.E. 621 (New York Court of Appeals, 1927)