Murphy v. Keil
40 A.D.2d 749, 338 N.Y.S.2d 411, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3734
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 19, 1972
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 40 A.D.2d 749 (Murphy v. Keil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Murphy v. Keil, 40 A.D.2d 749, 338 N.Y.S.2d 411, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion at Special Term. (Appeal from judgment of Oneida Special Term granting summary judgment in action to rescind stock purchase agreement.) Present—Del Vecchio, J. P., Marsh, Witmer, Moule and Cardamone, JJ. [71 Misc 2d 844.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Tanney v. Greaux
174 A.D.2d 728 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
40 A.D.2d 749, 338 N.Y.S.2d 411, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-keil-nyappdiv-1972.