Murphy v. Keen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Murphy v. Keen

261 A.D. 954, 27 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8294

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 21, 1941·Published

Opinion

There is substance to the claim that bookkeepers, messengers, telephone operators and automobile enginemen should not have been included among those eligible to take the examination. This objection, however, is of no practical significance as none of them passed the examination and their rights are not involved in this proceeding. Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

There is substance to the claim that bookkeepers, messengers, telephone operators and automobile enginemen should not have been included among those eligible to take the examination. This objection, however, is of no practical significance as none of them passed the examination and their rights are not involved in this proceeding. Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Murphy v. Keen, 261 A.D. 954, 27 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8294 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

261 A.D. 954 (Murphy v. Keen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.