Murphy v. Keen
This text of 261 A.D. 954 (Murphy v. Keen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is substance to the claim that bookkeepers, messengers, telephone operators and automobile enginemen should not have been included among those eligible to take the examination. This objection, however, is of no practical significance as none of them passed the examination and their rights are not involved in this proceeding. Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 A.D. 954, 27 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-keen-nyappdiv-1941.