Murphy v. Incorporated Village of Farmingdale

256 A.D. 942, 11 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5551
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Murphy v. Incorporated Village of Farmingdale. Read the opinion of the Court — 252 A.D. 327

Opinion

In a consolidated action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiffs respectively because of the alleged negligence of the defendant-municipality in the maintenance of a traffic stanchion in a public street, and because of alleged nuisance, order denying motion of defendant to change the place of trial from the county of Kings to the county of Nassau affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. Incorporated Village of Farmingdale, 256 A.D. 942, 11 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5551 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

256 A.D. 942 (Murphy v. Incorporated Village of Farmingdale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.