Murphy v. Huntington Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Murphy v. Huntington Hospital

246 A.D.2d 519, 666 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 215

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 12, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D.2d 519 (Murphy v. Huntington Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murphy v. Huntington Hospital, 246 A.D.2d 519, 666 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 215 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice [520]*520and wrongful death, nonparty Mark R Bower appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated December 17, 1996, which denied his motion to reopen the settlement of this action for reconsideration of the disbursement of counsel fees.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We find no basis to conclude that the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in determining the disbursement of counsel fees in this case (see, Clifford v Pierce, 214 AD2d 697, 698; Matter of Aronesty v Aronesty, 202 AD2d 240; Lefkowitz v Van Ess, 166 AD2d 556). O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice [520]*520and wrongful death, nonparty Mark R Bower appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated December 17, 1996, which denied his motion to reopen the settlement of this action for reconsideration of the disbursement of counsel fees.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We find no basis to conclude that the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in determining the disbursement of counsel fees in this case (see, Clifford v Pierce, 214 AD2d 697, 698; Matter of Aronesty v Aronesty, 202 AD2d 240; Lefkowitz v Van Ess, 166 AD2d 556). O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D.2d 519, 666 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-huntington-hospital-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack