Murphy v. Hoenigmann

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Murphy v. Hoenigmann

525 So. 2d 1009, 1988 WL 53050

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 31, 1988

DocketNo. 87-1738

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 525 So. 2d 1009 (Murphy v. Hoenigmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murphy v. Hoenigmann, 525 So. 2d 1009, 1988 WL 53050 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding that the trial court’s decision is supported by substantial, competent evidence, we affirm the Final Judgment. See Brown v. Taylor, 500 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Brown v. Vining, 334 So.2d 647 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); In re Estate of Agardy v. Dunn, 293 So.2d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); McDonough v. Rudisill, 229 So.2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969), cert. denied, 237 So.2d 532 (Fla.1970); Carberry v. Foley, 213 So.2d 635 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968), cert. denied, 222 So.2d 750 (Fla.1969).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Finding that the trial court’s decision is supported by substantial, competent evidence, we affirm the Final Judgment. See Brown v. Taylor, 500 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Brown v. Vining, 334 So.2d 647 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); In re Estate of Agardy v. Dunn, 293 So.2d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); McDonough v. Rudisill, 229 So.2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969), cert. denied, 237 So.2d 532 (Fla.1970); Carberry v. Foley, 213 So.2d 635 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968), cert. denied, 222 So.2d 750 (Fla.1969).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

525 So. 2d 1009, 1988 WL 53050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-hoenigmann-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack