Murphy v. Hoenigmann
525 So. 2d 1009, 1988 WL 53050
Opinion
Finding that the trial court’s decision is supported by substantial, competent evidence, we affirm the Final Judgment. See Brown v. Taylor, 500 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Brown v. Vining, 334 So.2d 647 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); In re Estate of Agardy v. Dunn, 293 So.2d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); McDonough v. Rudisill, 229 So.2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969), cert. denied, 237 So.2d 532 (Fla.1970); Carberry v. Foley, 213 So.2d 635 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968), cert. denied, 222 So.2d 750 (Fla.1969).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Murphy v. Hoenigmann, 525 So. 2d 1009, 1988 WL 53050 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
525 So. 2d 1009 (Murphy v. Hoenigmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thaxton v. State
525 So. 2d 1009 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)