Murphy v. Hall

24 A.D.2d 892, 264 N.Y.S.2d 782, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2979
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 22, 1965·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover upon promissory notes, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated November 20, 1964, which granted defendant’s motion to set aside a default judgment. Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied. The moving papers establish that defendant deliberately permitted the default to be taken against him and sought to reopen the proceedings only when it appeared that plaintiff, in proceedings supplementary to judgment, might be able to compel a corporation to which defendant rendered services, without compensation, to make payments in satisfaction of the debt. Under the circumstances, the default was not excusable and the motion should have been denied. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. Hall, 24 A.D.2d 892, 264 N.Y.S.2d 782, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2979 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

24 A.D.2d 892 (Murphy v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Special Products Manufacturing, Inc. v. Douglass
159 A.D.2d 847 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Formichella v. Formichella
134 A.D.2d 481 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Perellie v. Crimson's Restaurant, Ltd.
108 A.D.2d 903 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Harding v. New York State Teamsters Council Welfare Trust Fund
60 A.D.2d 975 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. Commercial Door & Hardware, Inc.
51 A.D.2d 362 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)