Murphy v. Graves

120 F.2d 243, 27 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 422, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3463
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMay 6, 1941
DocketNo. 8571
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 120 F.2d 243 (Murphy v. Graves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy v. Graves, 120 F.2d 243, 27 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 422, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3463 (6th Cir. 1941).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing from the record that appellee, Charles H. Graves, Collector of Internal Revenue for the Tenth Collection District of Ohio, having died during the pendency of this action and that James A. Brady, Acting Collector for said District, having succeeded him, it is ordered that this cause be revived and hereafter proceed against James A. Brady, Acting Collector of Internal Revenue for the Tenth Ohio Collection District.

It further appearing from the record that appellant, James W. Murphy, doing business as LaFrance Toledo- Company, seeks herein to restrain the assessment or collection of taxes against him by the appellee, James A. Brady, Acting Collector, made under the color of his office, and it further appearing that appellant seeks a declaratory judgment declaring his rights and legal liability to pay taxes proposed to be assessed against him by appellee, and it appearing that no fact is in the record showing extraordinary and entirely exceptional circumstances making inapplicable Section 3224 of the Revised Statutes, Title 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, § 3653, which prohibits suits to restrain the assessment or collection of taxes made by Internal Revenue officers under color of their offices, (Snyder v. Marks, 109 U.S. 189, 3 S.Ct. 157, 27 L.Ed. 901), and it appearing that Judicial Code, Section 274d, 49 Statutes at Large 1027, Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 400, withholds from the jurisdiction of Federal Courts the right to entertain a declaratory judgment action with respect to Federal taxes,

It is hereby ordered that the decree of the District Court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Biggs v. United States
326 F. Supp. 749 (E.D. Kentucky, 1971)
Martin v. Andrews
238 F.2d 552 (Ninth Circuit, 1956)
Kindred v. Anderson
209 S.W.2d 912 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1948)
Harrington v. Cobb
185 S.W.2d 133 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 F.2d 243, 27 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 422, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-graves-ca6-1941.