Murphy v. Glafenhein
436 S.E.2d 382, 335 N.C. 176
Opinion
Motion by defendant Glafenhein to dismiss appeal by defendant Manning for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 7 [177]*177October 1993. Petition by defendant Manning for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 October 1993. Petition by defendant Glafenhein for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 October 1993.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Murphy v. Glafenhein, 436 S.E.2d 382, 335 N.C. 176 (N.C. 1993).
436 S.E.2d 382 (Murphy v. Glafenhein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tejal Vyas, LLC v. Carriage Park Ltd. Partnership
600 S.E.2d 881 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
Adams, Kleemeier, Hagan, Hannah & Fouts, PLLC v. Jacobs
581 S.E.2d 798 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2003)
Sherlock v. Sherlock
545 S.E.2d 757 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2001)
Bruggeman v. Meditrust Acquisition Co.
532 S.E.2d 215 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)
Hiwassee Stables, Inc. v. Cunningham
519 S.E.2d 317 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1999)
Replacements, Ltd. v. Midwesterling
515 S.E.2d 46 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1999)
Better Business Forms, Inc. v. Davis
462 S.E.2d 832 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1995)