Murphy v. Fuld

9 P. 609, 2 Idaho 175, 1886 Ida. LEXIS 9
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 8, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 9 P. 609 (Murphy v. Fuld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy v. Fuld, 9 P. 609, 2 Idaho 175, 1886 Ida. LEXIS 9 (Idaho 1886).

Opinion

HAYS, C. J.

This appeal is from the judgment. There is no bill of exceptions in the record. It nowhere appears in the transcript that defendant Bosa Fuld is married; hence the argument on that point cannot be considered. .We think the complaint will sustain the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Buck and Broderick, JJ., concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dawson v. Olson
543 P.2d 499 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 P. 609, 2 Idaho 175, 1886 Ida. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-fuld-idaho-1886.