Murphy v. Fuld

9 P. 609, 2 Idaho 175, 1886 Ida. LEXIS 9
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided February 8, 1886·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

HAYS, C. J.

This appeal is from the judgment. There is no bill of exceptions in the record. It nowhere appears in the transcript that defendant Bosa Fuld is married; hence the argument on that point cannot be considered. .We think the complaint will sustain the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Buck and Broderick, JJ., concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. Fuld, 9 P. 609, 2 Idaho 175, 1886 Ida. LEXIS 9 (Idaho 1886).

9 P. 609 (Murphy v. Fuld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dawson v. Olson
543 P.2d 499 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1975)