Murphy v. Flanagan

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2007·No. 07-6658·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6658

TROY LAMONT MURPHY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LOUISE W. FLANAGAN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:07-ct-3017-BO)

Submitted: July 19, 2007 Decided: July 25, 2007

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Troy Lamont Murphy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Troy Lamont Murphy appeals the district court’s order

dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) his complaint

filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau

of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and

find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Murphy v.

Flanagan, No. 5:07-ct-3017-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 10, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. Flanagan, (4th Cir. 2007).

Murphy v. Flanagan (Murphy v. Flanagan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related