Murphy v. EAPWJP, LLC

5 A.3d 489, 298 Conn. 930, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 389
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 7, 2010·No. SC 18696·Published

Opinion

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 123 Conn. App. 316 (AC 31257), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that construction and use of a walkway deemed to be a per se public nuisance can establish a prescriptive easement over the underlying tidal wetlands?”

McLACHLAN, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. EAPWJP, LLC, 5 A.3d 489, 298 Conn. 930, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 389 (Colo. 2010).

5 A.3d 489 (Murphy v. EAPWJP, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. EAPWJP, LLC
1 A.3d 1171 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)