Murphy v. EAPWJP, LLC
5 A.3d 489, 298 Conn. 930, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 389
This text of 5 A.3d 489 (Murphy v. EAPWJP, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Murphy v. EAPWJP, LLC, 5 A.3d 489, 298 Conn. 930, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 389 (Colo. 2010).
Opinion
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 123 Conn. App. 316 (AC 31257), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that construction and use of a walkway deemed to be a per se public nuisance can establish a prescriptive easement over the underlying tidal wetlands?”
McLACHLAN, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Murphy v. EAPWJP, LLC
1 A.3d 1171 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 A.3d 489, 298 Conn. 930, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-eapwjp-llc-conn-2010.