Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Murphy v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA

Murphy v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA

981 A.2d 1285, 603 Pa. 69, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2025
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 22, 2009
Docket113 EM 2009
StatusPublished

This text of 981 A.2d 1285 (Murphy v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA, 981 A.2d 1285, 603 Pa. 69, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2025 (Pa. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of September, 2009, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid *70 representation improper). The Prothonotary is directed to forward these filings to counsel of record. See CP-51-CR-0013668-2008.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
981 A.2d 1285, 603 Pa. 69, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-district-attorney-of-philadelphia-pa-2009.