Murphy v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Murphy v. County of Nassau

273 A.D.2d 391, 711 N.Y.S.2d 334, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7076

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 19, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 273 A.D.2d 391 (Murphy v. County of Nassau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murphy v. County of Nassau, 273 A.D.2d 391, 711 N.Y.S.2d 334, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7076 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, in effect, to compel the respondent to provide safe, convenient, and accessible parking to employees of the Nassau County District Court, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Colabella, J.), dated May 18, 1999, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 39 (3) (a), the County of Nassau is required to provide the same type of facilities to all court employees as it did prior to the State’s takeover of the court system on April 1,1977. The Supreme Court properly concluded that the parking facilities presently provided by the County to employees of the Nassau County District Court fail to meet that mandate (see, Matter of Drew v Schenectady County, 88 NY2d 242). Santucci, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, in effect, to compel the respondent to provide safe, convenient, and accessible parking to employees of the Nassau County District Court, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Colabella, J.), dated May 18, 1999, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 39 (3) (a), the County of Nassau is required to provide the same type of facilities to all court employees as it did prior to the State’s takeover of the court system on April 1,1977. The Supreme Court properly concluded that the parking facilities presently provided by the County to employees of the Nassau County District Court fail to meet that mandate (see, Matter of Drew v Schenectady County, 88 NY2d 242). Santucci, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 A.D.2d 391, 711 N.Y.S.2d 334, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-county-of-nassau-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack