Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
738 A.2d 1091, 251 Conn. 904, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 363
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 29, 1999
DocketSC 16193
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 738 A.2d 1091 (Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 738 A.2d 1091, 251 Conn. 904, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 363 (Colo. 1999).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 127 (AC 17906), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the evidence in the administrative record was insufficient to establish probable cause that the plaintiff had violated General Statutes § 14-227a?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
757 A.2d 561 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)
Keogh v. Salinas, No. Cv 98 049 91 55 (Apr. 4, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 4186 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
738 A.2d 1091, 251 Conn. 904, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-commissioner-of-motor-vehicles-conn-1999.