Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles

Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles

738 A.2d 1091, 251 Conn. 904, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 363
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 29, 1999·No. SC 16193·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 127 (AC 17906), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[905]*905The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16193. Priscilla J. Green, assistant attorney general, in support of the petition. Barry N. Silver, in opposition. Decided September 29, 1999
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the evidence in the administrative record was insufficient to establish probable cause that the plaintiff had violated General Statutes § 14-227a?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 738 A.2d 1091, 251 Conn. 904, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 363 (Colo. 1999).

738 A.2d 1091 (Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
757 A.2d 561 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)
Keogh v. Salinas, No. Cv 98 049 91 55 (Apr. 4, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 4186 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)