Murphy v. Colonial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

New York Court of Appeals

Murphy v. Colonial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

215 N.E.2d 525, 17 N.Y.2d 593, 268 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1553

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 24, 1966

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 215 N.E.2d 525 (Murphy v. Colonial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murphy v. Colonial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, 215 N.E.2d 525, 17 N.Y.2d 593, 268 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1553 (N.Y. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: In accordance with the principles laid down in our opinion in Matter of Ochs v. Washington Hgts. Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. (17 N Y 2d 82), decided herewith, petitioners in this ease are entitled to inspection of the association’s membership list so that they may effectively participate, by their right to vote, in the management of said association. Since no issue of fact is raised herein as to the “ good faith ” of petitioners, they must be allowed the exercise of this common-law right, limited, as in Matter of Ochs, to solely the names and addresses of their fellow members. The order of the Appellate Division should thus be affirmed.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Vooehis, Burke, Scilepri, Bergan and Keating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: In accordance with the principles laid down in our opinion in Matter of Ochs v. Washington Hgts. Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. (17 N Y 2d 82), decided herewith, petitioners in this ease are entitled to inspection of the association’s membership list so that they may effectively participate, by their right to vote, in the management of said association. Since no issue of fact is raised herein as to the “ good faith ” of petitioners, they must be allowed the exercise of this common-law right, limited, as in Matter of Ochs, to solely the names and addresses of their fellow members. The order of the Appellate Division should thus be affirmed.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Vooehis, Burke, Scilepri, Bergan and Keating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 N.E.2d 525, 17 N.Y.2d 593, 268 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-colonial-federal-savings-loan-assn-ny-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack