Murphy v. City of Stamford
982 A.2d 645, 294 Conn. 901
This text of 982 A.2d 645 (Murphy v. City of Stamford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Murphy v. City of Stamford, 982 A.2d 645, 294 Conn. 901 (Colo. 2009).
Opinion
Karen A. MURPHY
v.
CITY OF STAMFORD et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Karen A. Murphy, pro se, in support of the petition.
Kenneth B. Povodator, assistant corporation counsel, in opposition.
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 115 Conn.App. 675, 974 A.2d 68 (2009), is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Murphy v. City of Stamford
974 A.2d 68 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
982 A.2d 645, 294 Conn. 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-city-of-stamford-conn-2009.