Murphy v. City of New York
This text of 26 A.D.3d 190 (Murphy v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered October 5, 2005, which denied the motion of third-party [191]*191defendant-appellant Yellowstone Industries for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Issues of fact as to whether the defect in the roadway was caused in some measure by Yellowstone Industries, which performed excavation work at or near the accident site, mandated the denial of Yellowstone’s summary judgment motion (see Murphy v City of New York, 216 AD2d 110 [1995]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Marlow, Sweeny, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A.D.3d 190, 807 N.Y.S.2d 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2006.