Murphy v. Capone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Murphy v. Capone

120 A.D.2d 714, 502 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56838

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 120 A.D.2d 714 (Murphy v. Capone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murphy v. Capone, 120 A.D.2d 714, 502 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for defamation, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Palella, J.), entered August 21, 1985, which denied his motion for partial summary judgment.

Order modified, on the law, by adding a provision thereto, that, upon searching the record, the plaintiff’s 127th cause of action is dismissed. As so modified, order affirmed, with costs to the respondents Capone, Carolin, Crescenzi, Decaprio, Dolorosa, Fischer, Fitzgibbon, Healey, Landry, McCaffrey, Order of Franciscan Sisters, Palmer, St. Agnes Hospital and Trout.

The plaintiff’s cause of action against the defendant hospital for tortious interference with his contract with the hospital must be dismissed. A party to a contract may not be held liable for tortiously inducing the breach of that contract (see, Ryan v Brooklyn Eye & Ear Hosp., 46 AD2d 87). Since issues of fact exist with respect to the plaintiff’s remaining causes of [715]*715action, summary judgment was properly denied (see, Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Center, 64 NY2d 851). Gibbons, J. P., Eiber, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for defamation, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Palella, J.), entered August 21, 1985, which denied his motion for partial summary judgment.

Order modified, on the law, by adding a provision thereto, that, upon searching the record, the plaintiff’s 127th cause of action is dismissed. As so modified, order affirmed, with costs to the respondents Capone, Carolin, Crescenzi, Decaprio, Dolorosa, Fischer, Fitzgibbon, Healey, Landry, McCaffrey, Order of Franciscan Sisters, Palmer, St. Agnes Hospital and Trout.

The plaintiff’s cause of action against the defendant hospital for tortious interference with his contract with the hospital must be dismissed. A party to a contract may not be held liable for tortiously inducing the breach of that contract (see, Ryan v Brooklyn Eye & Ear Hosp., 46 AD2d 87). Since issues of fact exist with respect to the plaintiff’s remaining causes of [715]*715action, summary judgment was properly denied (see, Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Center, 64 NY2d 851). Gibbons, J. P., Eiber, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A.D.2d 714, 502 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-capone-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack