Murphy v. Camac

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania

Murphy v. Camac

17 F. Cas. 1033, 4 Wash. C. C. 307

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 15, 1822

StatusPublished

This text of 17 F. Cas. 1033 (Murphy v. Camac) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murphy v. Camac, 17 F. Cas. 1033, 4 Wash. C. C. 307 (circtdpa 1822).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment was confessed in this case for $1100, Irish sterling, at the November term 1S20 [see Case No. 2,226], with liberty to prove any discounts at a future session of the court. The plaintiff now admitted that the defendant was entitled to a credit against the judgment to the amount of 8-, and the only question submitted to the court was, whether the rate of exchange should be settled as of the day when the judgment- was confessed, or as of the present time. The court decided, that the rate of exchange when the judgment was confessed ought to govern.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment was confessed in this case for $1100, Irish sterling, at the November term 1S20 [see Case No. 2,226], with liberty to prove any discounts at a future session of the court. The plaintiff now admitted that the defendant was entitled to a credit against the judgment to the amount of 8-, and the only question submitted to the court was, whether the rate of exchange should be settled as of the day when the judgment- was confessed, or as of the present time. The court decided, that the rate of exchange when the judgment was confessed ought to govern.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 F. Cas. 1033, 4 Wash. C. C. 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-camac-circtdpa-1822.