Murphy v. Buonato

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Murphy v. Buonato

684 A.2d 708, 239 Conn. 935, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 448

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedOctober 29, 1996

DocketSC 15558

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 684 A.2d 708 (Murphy v. Buonato) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murphy v. Buonato, 684 A.2d 708, 239 Conn. 935, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 448 (Colo. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 239 (AC 14053), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the plaintiff was a ‘keeper’ under General Statutes § 22-327 and prohibited from recovering from the dog’s owner for injuries caused by the dog when the plaintiff was temporarily caring for the dog at the owner’s request?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 239 (AC 14053), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the plaintiff was a ‘keeper’ under General Statutes § 22-327 and prohibited from recovering from the dog’s owner for injuries caused by the dog when the plaintiff was temporarily caring for the dog at the owner’s request?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

684 A.2d 708, 239 Conn. 935, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-buonato-conn-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack