Murphy v. Broadway & Seventh Ave. R. R. Co.

42 N.Y. St. Rep. 957
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided January 11, 1892·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The points raised by the appellant’s brief appear, on examination, to be untenable. The case was one for the jury. The manner in which it was submitted has not been assailed.

The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

Freedman, McAdam and Gildersleeve, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. Broadway & Seventh Ave. R. R. Co., 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 957 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

42 N.Y. St. Rep. 957 (Murphy v. Broadway & Seventh Ave. R. R. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.