Murphy v. Broadway & Seventh Ave. R. R. Co.
42 N.Y. St. Rep. 957
This text of 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 957 (Murphy v. Broadway & Seventh Ave. R. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Murphy v. Broadway & Seventh Ave. R. R. Co., 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 957 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).
Opinion
The points raised by the appellant’s brief appear, on examination, to be untenable. The case was one for the jury. The manner in which it was submitted has not been assailed.
The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.
Freedman, McAdam and Gildersleeve, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
42 N.Y. St. Rep. 957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-broadway-seventh-ave-r-r-co-nysuperctnyc-1892.