Murphy v. Board of Commissioners of Newark
1 A.2d 376, 121 N.J.L. 75, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 396
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Murphy v. Board of Commissioners of Newark, 1 A.2d 376, 121 N.J.L. 75, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 396 (N.J. 1938).
1 A.2d 376 (Murphy v. Board of Commissioners of Newark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kagan v. Caroselli
153 A.2d 17 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1959)
Grogan v. De Sapio
88 A.2d 666 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Pashman v. Friedbauer
63 A.2d 838 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)